Conclusions
While this study was not able to find significant chlorophyll-α variance with sediment type and stream flow, it contributed great improvements to the laboratory methods. A sieve analysis was developed to quantitatively classify sediment composition. Quantitative classification is vital because our data suggests that previous cohorts may have skewed their results by misidentifying sediment type using a qualitative approach. Additionally, sample filtration was previously the time-limiting step in the laboratory process. The filtration time was reduced significantly by centrifuging the samples at 3600 rpm for 3 minutes. Lastly, a new equation was used to calculate chlorophyll-α concentration from absorbance that does not require sample acidification. This prevented the formation of a precipitate, as the plastic cuvettes used in the spectrophotometer were found to be soluble in acetone and the acidification crashed the plastic out of solution.
​
-
Collect periphyton samples during a low-flow period
-
Sample locations further apart
-
Measure stream velocity with a flow meter
-
Further refine the sieve method
-
Include a macro-invertebrate study
-
Do not use polystyrene cuvettes for the spectrophotometer.
Recommendations

Quartz/Glass Cuvettes
-
Inert- will not react with organic solvents including acetone
-
Reusable- only need 1
-
More expensive
​
PMMA Cuvettes
-
Not soluble in Acetone
-
Disposable- will need as many cuvettes as there is samples
-
Cheaper
-
Only accurate between 285 nm to 750 nm​
